VIP
  • Reports
  • Data Catalogue
  • Weekly Analysis
  • Frontier

More detailed breakdown on impacts of shocks and efficient measuring of mental health

Published

March 12, 2026

Abstract

Descriptives on shocks, mental health dynamics and correlation between measures

Shocks

Impact of Shocks on Mental Health

Note

A negative shock is either a natural disaster or a livestock death. The N (positive) row in the table below indicate how many of each shock kind we’ve had in the study. Additionally, more descriptives are available below

The regressions below show the impact of having a shock within a study period on participants’ mental health. Overall, funerals improve mental health, which is not unexpected since they are a large ceremony in rural Ghana according to Damien. Additionally, the questionnaires don’t necessarily specify who’s funeral it is and so the most salient part of the funeral might be the ceremony. However, death of livestock and natural disasters also improve mental health. And, religious events seem to decrease it.

All the regressions included household and period fixed effects. The results are robust to survey month FEs, as well as no time FEs at all. They are also directionally consistent when using different measures of mental health or when only considering the control group, though magnitudes and significance vary (see appendix for more results)

Outcome: Mental Health Index
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.0940** -0.1497*** -0.0922** -0.1742** -0.0979**
(0.0406) (0.0385) (0.0440) (0.0868) (0.0408)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) 0.0018 0.0005 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003
N (positive) 773 667 440 81 513
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01

Impacts of Shocks - Dynamics

One potential story is the shocks aren’t instant but continuous stressors. For example, the death of a relative could be preceeded by periods of illness, large health care costs and so on. Thus, the actual shock itself might not make things worse.

In such a scenario, shocks would have impact mental health in the period before the actual shock itself. However, regression results don’t support this idea.

  • Funeral
  • Religious Event
  • Livestock death
  • Negative shocks

Cost of shocks

The impact of a shock does not seem to be affected by the costs associated with it. Below, the coefficients associated with the shock costs are per 100 cedis

Outcome: Mental Health Index
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.1116** -0.1333*** -0.0801 -0.1140 -0.0878*
(0.0492) (0.0417) (0.0501) (0.1102) (0.0462)
Shock Cost -0.00487060 -0.00341268 -0.00135938 -0.01536153 -0.00120463
(0.00846744) (0.00346892) (0.00179716) (0.01557997) (0.00181409)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) 0.0018 0.0006 0.0003 0.0003 0.0004
N (positive) 773 667 440 81 513
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01

Hetereogeneity by household characteristics

There seems to be some heterogeneity in the shock impacts. Notably, funerals improve MH for HHs with good mental health at baseline. And, religious events have negative impacts on those who are below median on the census wealth index (could be because associated costs are more burdensome for poorer households).

  • Mental Health
  • Wealth
Outcome: Mental Health Index — Above-Median Baseline MH
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.1108* -0.2275*** -0.0748 -0.1597 -0.0855
(0.0578) (0.0526) (0.0645) (0.1178) (0.0595)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 7,402 7,402 7,402 7,402 7,402
R² (within) 0.0020 0.0013 -0.0000 0.0002 0.0001
N (positive) 383 347 224 42 260
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: Mental Health Index — Below-Median Baseline MH
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.0767 -0.0646 -0.1107* -0.1863 -0.1111**
(0.0570) (0.0564) (0.0597) (0.1272) (0.0558)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 7,264 7,264 7,264 7,264 7,264
R² (within) 0.0015 0.0000 0.0006 0.0003 0.0007
N (positive) 390 320 216 39 253
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: Mental Health Index — Above-Median Baseline Wealth
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.0218 -0.1663*** -0.0557 -0.1253 -0.0501
(0.0529) (0.0538) (0.0596) (0.1184) (0.0558)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 7,425 7,425 7,425 7,425 7,425
R² (within) 0.0004 0.0007 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
N (positive) 430 321 246 40 280
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: Mental Health Index — Below-Median Baseline Wealth
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.1805*** -0.1337** -0.1417** -0.2271* -0.1597***
(0.0627) (0.0549) (0.0653) (0.1274) (0.0598)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 7,241 7,241 7,241 7,241 7,241
R² (within) 0.0036 0.0003 0.0005 0.0004 0.0008
N (positive) 343 346 194 41 233
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01

Selection Effects

Shocked households seem to be somewhat richer and larger. However, these should not bias the regression results since we are controlling for household fixed effects.

Baseline Balance of shocked and unshocked households

Balance test: Baseline covariates by endline non-religious shock status (N shocked=347, N not shocked=1925)
Variable Shocked (mean) Not shocked (mean) Diff Norm. diff p-value
PHQ-8 (depression, z) 0.058 -0.010 0.068 0.069 0.236
GAD-7 (anxiety, z) 0.043 -0.008 0.051 0.051 0.382
PSS-10 (stress, z) 0.046 -0.008 0.055 0.055 0.336
PSWQ-16 (worry, z) -0.033 0.006 -0.040 -0.040 0.479
Diener-5 (wellbeing, z) 0.085 -0.015 0.100 0.101 0.078
MH index (average) 0.038 -0.007 0.044 0.066 0.251
Cantril (total) 10.948 11.222 -0.274 -0.072 0.217
Wealth index (census) -0.179 -0.268 0.089 0.139 0.019
Total consumption (AE, win.) 345.771 344.722 1.049 0.005 0.935
Food consumption (AE, win.) 264.772 253.476 11.296 0.061 0.309
Total income (AE, win.) 91.269 83.142 8.127 0.046 0.420
Current savings (win.) 307.045 264.818 42.227 0.090 0.132
Livestock owned (win.) 4000.285 2708.229 1292.056 0.164 0.011
Durable goods value (win.) 9543.798 8335.584 1208.214 0.134 0.030
Loans taken 0.608 0.549 0.059 0.059 0.309
Household size 8.043 7.655 0.389 0.146 0.012
Participant age 32.931 32.671 0.260 0.029 0.612
Education (years) 1.366 1.498 -0.133 -0.039 0.497
Number of children 4.542 4.299 0.243 0.109 0.067
Number of adults 3.527 3.367 0.161 0.154 0.007
Dependency ratio 1.415 1.393 0.021 0.028 0.641
Body weight (kg) 57.001 58.103 -1.102 -0.076 0.124
Dietary diversity (HDDS) 5.144 5.045 0.099 0.052 0.367
Food insecurity index 0.001 -0.003 0.004 0.006 0.919
Medical expenses 84.324 69.527 14.797 0.040 0.559
Welch's t-test (unequal variance). Norm. diff = difference / sqrt((s²_shocked + s²_not) / 2).

Selection into who reports a shock

It seems that people with worse mental health at time of survey are more likely to report a shock. However, this isn’t perfectly consistent across measures.

  • Mental Health Index
  • PHQ-2 (Depression)
  • GAD-2 (Anxiety)
  • PSS-4 (Stress)
  • PSWQ-3 (Worry)
  • Diener 3-item (Wellbeing)
Outcome: Mental health index (anderson) at Endline
Relative Death Religious Event Negative Shock Livestock Death Natural Disaster
Shock 0.0918* 0.0142 0.0093 -0.0071 0.0721
(0.0476) (0.0900) (0.0463) (0.0457) (0.0725)
Community FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186
R² 0.1777 0.1763 0.1763 0.1763 0.1767
N Reported Shocks 1,228 1,723 1,198 1,059 290
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: PHQ-2 (Depression) at Endline
Relative Death Religious Event Negative Shock Livestock Death Natural Disaster
Shock 0.1506*** 0.0507 0.0901* 0.0590 0.1081
(0.0486) (0.0923) (0.0464) (0.0459) (0.0725)
Community FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186
R² 0.0886 0.0845 0.0860 0.0850 0.0853
N Reported Shocks 1,228 1,723 1,198 1,059 290
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: GAD-2 (Anxiety) at Endline
Relative Death Religious Event Negative Shock Livestock Death Natural Disaster
Shock 0.0994* -0.0330 0.0528 0.0190 0.1742**
(0.0522) (0.0979) (0.0492) (0.0492) (0.0788)
Community FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186
R² 0.1021 0.1006 0.1010 0.1006 0.1028
N Reported Shocks 1,228 1,723 1,198 1,059 290
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: PSS-4 (Stress) at Endline
Relative Death Religious Event Negative Shock Livestock Death Natural Disaster
Shock 0.1413** -0.1806* -0.0074 -0.0070 0.0307
(0.0556) (0.0991) (0.0544) (0.0532) (0.0826)
Community FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186
R² 0.1156 0.1143 0.1128 0.1128 0.1129
N Reported Shocks 1,228 1,723 1,198 1,059 290
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: PSWQ-3 (Worry) at Endline
Relative Death Religious Event Negative Shock Livestock Death Natural Disaster
Shock 0.1070** 0.1253 0.0206 0.0050 0.0697
(0.0452) (0.0831) (0.0439) (0.0431) (0.0668)
Community FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186
R² 0.1728 0.1715 0.1706 0.1705 0.1710
N Reported Shocks 1,228 1,723 1,198 1,059 290
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: Diener 3-item (Wellbeing) at Endline
Relative Death Religious Event Negative Shock Livestock Death Natural Disaster
Shock 0.0998** -0.0412 0.0735* 0.0617 0.0684
(0.0439) (0.0865) (0.0436) (0.0432) (0.0681)
Community FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186
R² 0.1539 0.1520 0.1530 0.1527 0.1523
N Reported Shocks 1,228 1,723 1,198 1,059 290
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01

Community Effects

Below, we take a look at how being a in community that is shocked affects a household. Note that being in a shocked is a reasonably good predictor of experiencing a shock (see table in appendix)

Being in a community with more shocks

Below, we define number of shocks per community member in each period as a measure of shock density. Community size is defined as both the number of participants in a community. Shocks per participant calculation excludes the household’s own shock, so a household isn’t “predicting itself” by reporting a shock. We find that being in a community with more shocks is associated with better mental health.

Outcome: Mental Health Index. Columns indicate type of shock
Non-religious shocks Negative shocks Funeral / Death of relative
Community shocks / participant -0.3032*** -0.3492** -0.2831*
(0.1070) (0.1540) (0.1557)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) -0.0019 -0.0002 -0.0014
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01

Interaction with Community Effects

It doesn’t seem that there is much interaction between experiencing a shock and being a community that is shocked a lot. As seen in previous regressions, shocks and being a in a shocked community seemingly improves mental health, but the interaction between the two is generally insignificant, though notable in magnitude.

  • MH Index
  • PHQ-2 (Depression)
  • GAD-2 (Anxiety)
  • PSS-4 (Stress)
  • PSWQ-3 (Worry)
  • Diener 3-item (Wellbeing)
Outcome: Mental health index (anderson). Columns indicate type of shock
Non-religious shocks Non-religious shocks w/ int. Negative Shocks Negative shocks w/ int Funeral / Death of relative Funeral / Death of relative w/ int
Shocked (individual) -0.1208*** -0.0688 -0.0921** -0.0832 -0.1454*** -0.1447***
(0.0304) (0.0473) (0.0409) (0.0579) (0.0385) (0.0539)
Community shocks / participant -0.2696** -0.2161* -0.3280** -0.3194** -0.2470 -0.2463
(0.1067) (0.1146) (0.1542) (0.1604) (0.1555) (0.1619)
Shocked × community shocks / participant -0.3507 -0.1256 -0.0074
(0.2487) (0.5082) (0.4307)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) -0.0013 -0.0012 0.0001 0.0001 -0.0009 -0.0009
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: PHQ-2 (Depression). Columns indicate type of shock
Non-religious shocks Non-religious shocks w/ int. Negative Shocks Negative shocks w/ int Funeral / Death of relative Funeral / Death of relative w/ int
Shocked (individual) -0.0943*** -0.0783 -0.0581 -0.0282 -0.1300*** -0.1380**
(0.0315) (0.0483) (0.0432) (0.0608) (0.0394) (0.0569)
Community shocks / participant -0.2731** -0.2566** -0.4107*** -0.3816** -0.1817 -0.1902
(0.1112) (0.1174) (0.1556) (0.1614) (0.1588) (0.1656)
Shocked × community shocks / participant -0.1082 -0.4211 0.0847
(0.2713) (0.5853) (0.4664)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) -0.0051 -0.0051 -0.0016 -0.0014 -0.0027 -0.0027
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: GAD-2 (Anxiety). Columns indicate type of shock
Non-religious shocks Non-religious shocks w/ int. Negative Shocks Negative shocks w/ int Funeral / Death of relative Funeral / Death of relative w/ int
Shocked (individual) -0.0930*** -0.0341 -0.0342 -0.0254 -0.1438*** -0.1343**
(0.0348) (0.0538) (0.0498) (0.0664) (0.0434) (0.0630)
Community shocks / participant -0.1861 -0.1256 -0.2757 -0.2672 -0.1241 -0.1140
(0.1204) (0.1288) (0.1695) (0.1766) (0.1773) (0.1836)
Shocked × community shocks / participant -0.3969 -0.1240 -0.1009
(0.3040) (0.6272) (0.5168)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) -0.0043 -0.0039 -0.0015 -0.0014 -0.0024 -0.0024
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: PSS-4 (Stress). Columns indicate type of shock
Non-religious shocks Non-religious shocks w/ int. Negative Shocks Negative shocks w/ int Funeral / Death of relative Funeral / Death of relative w/ int
Shocked (individual) -0.0611 -0.0515 -0.0776 -0.1320* -0.0598 -0.0580
(0.0391) (0.0607) (0.0532) (0.0733) (0.0503) (0.0725)
Community shocks / participant -0.1195 -0.1096 0.0382 -0.0145 -0.2492 -0.2473
(0.1302) (0.1394) (0.1891) (0.1973) (0.1844) (0.1908)
Shocked × community shocks / participant -0.0652 0.7644 -0.0190
(0.3082) (0.6542) (0.5277)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) 0.0005 0.0004 0.0002 0.0004 0.0003 0.0003
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: PSWQ-3 (Worry). Columns indicate type of shock
Non-religious shocks Non-religious shocks w/ int. Negative Shocks Negative shocks w/ int Funeral / Death of relative Funeral / Death of relative w/ int
Shocked (individual) -0.0840** -0.0389 -0.0646 -0.0643 -0.0989** -0.1302**
(0.0359) (0.0568) (0.0504) (0.0721) (0.0448) (0.0629)
Community shocks / participant -0.2975** -0.2511** -0.1881 -0.1877 -0.4252** -0.4584**
(0.1172) (0.1262) (0.1882) (0.1935) (0.1709) (0.1803)
Shocked × community shocks / participant -0.3040 -0.0048 0.3297
(0.3031) (0.6736) (0.5043)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) -0.0030 -0.0030 -0.0004 -0.0004 -0.0031 -0.0031
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: Diener 3-item (Wellbeing). Columns indicate type of shock
Non-religious shocks Non-religious shocks w/ int. Negative Shocks Negative shocks w/ int Funeral / Death of relative Funeral / Death of relative w/ int
Shocked (individual) 0.0657** 0.0291 0.0602 0.0316 0.0607 0.0395
(0.0329) (0.0525) (0.0475) (0.0681) (0.0413) (0.0616)
Community shocks / participant 0.0557 0.0180 0.2191 0.1913 -0.0673 -0.0899
(0.1096) (0.1168) (0.1654) (0.1692) (0.1647) (0.1702)
Shocked × community shocks / participant 0.2469 0.4022 0.2239
(0.2844) (0.6706) (0.4999)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) 0.0019 0.0019 0.0014 0.0014 0.0002 0.0002
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01

Descriptives on Shocks

Timing of Shocks

Reported shock dates in baseline and endline surveys. Point shape indicates whether the shock was reported in period 0 or period 6; counts are capped at 100 households on the y-axis

Reported shock dates in baseline and endline surveys. Point shape indicates whether the shock was reported in period 0 or period 6; counts are capped at 100 households on the y-axis

Types of shock we had and counts

Note

Transparent colors indicate endline data

Count of households reporting each shock type at baseline (period 0)

Count of households reporting each shock type at baseline (period 0)

Shocks and Communities - Descriptives

  • All non-religious shocks per study participant
  • Natural disaster shocks per study participant
  • Livestock death shocks per study participant
  • Relative death shocks per study participant

  • Non-religious shocks geographic distribution
  • Natural disasters distribution
  • Livestock death distribution
/var/folders/rj/c4rjx52d217gsm3ccfx5q20r0000gr/T/ipykernel_99518/1357806734.py:33: DeprecationWarning: *scattermapbox* is deprecated! Use *scattermap* instead. Learn more at: https://plotly.com/python/mapbox-to-maplibre/
/var/folders/rj/c4rjx52d217gsm3ccfx5q20r0000gr/T/ipykernel_99518/1357806734.py:33: DeprecationWarning: *scattermapbox* is deprecated! Use *scattermap* instead. Learn more at: https://plotly.com/python/mapbox-to-maplibre/
/var/folders/rj/c4rjx52d217gsm3ccfx5q20r0000gr/T/ipykernel_99518/1357806734.py:33: DeprecationWarning: *scattermapbox* is deprecated! Use *scattermap* instead. Learn more at: https://plotly.com/python/mapbox-to-maplibre/

Appendix

Regressions - Shocks on Mental Health

The below are alternate specs for the main shock regressions with different sets of fixed effects and impact on individual mental health measures.

  • Control Group Only
  • Survey Month FEs
  • No Time FEs
  • PHQ-2 (Depression)
  • GAD-2 (Anxiety)
  • PSS-4 (Stress)
  • PSWQ-3 (Worry)
  • Diener 3-item (Wellbeing)
Outcome: Mental Health Index
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.1170 -0.1235 -0.0968 -0.2061 -0.1018
(0.0858) (0.0824) (0.1080) (0.3937) (0.1047)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 2,508 2,508 2,508 2,508 2,508
R² (within) 0.0009 0.0007 0.0004 0.0001 0.0005
N (positive) 122 95 85 4 89
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: Mental Health Index
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.1308*** -0.1077*** -0.0743* -0.1845** -0.0850**
(0.0346) (0.0355) (0.0407) (0.0792) (0.0376)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) 0.0078 0.0073 0.0068 0.0069 0.0070
N (positive) 773 667 440 81 513
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: Mental Health Index
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.1725*** -0.1003*** -0.0742* -0.1822** -0.0838**
(0.0332) (0.0345) (0.0400) (0.0788) (0.0369)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) 0.0022 0.0007 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003
N (positive) 773 667 440 81 513
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: PHQ-2 (Depression)
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.0556 -0.1332*** -0.0545 -0.1499 -0.0654
(0.0409) (0.0395) (0.0468) (0.1022) (0.0432)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) 0.0006 -0.0006 -0.0001 0.0002 -0.0001
N (positive) 773 667 440 81 513
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: GAD-2 (Anxiety)
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock -0.0029 -0.1460*** -0.0216 -0.0703 -0.0391
(0.0434) (0.0433) (0.0539) (0.1214) (0.0497)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) -0.0001 -0.0009 -0.0001 0.0000 -0.0001
N (positive) 773 667 440 81 513
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: PSS-4 (Stress)
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.1109** -0.0642 -0.0612 -0.1662 -0.0770
(0.0466) (0.0500) (0.0576) (0.1176) (0.0531)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) 0.0004 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0003
N (positive) 773 667 440 81 513
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: PSWQ-3 (Worry)
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock 0.0785* -0.1063** -0.0864 0.0307 -0.0680
(0.0461) (0.0448) (0.0534) (0.1302) (0.0503)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) 0.0011 -0.0003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
N (positive) 773 667 440 81 513
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Outcome: Diener 3-item (Wellbeing)
Religious Event Relative Death Livestock Death Natural Disaster Negative shocks
Shock -0.0575 0.0595 0.0645 0.1784 0.0641
(0.0441) (0.0412) (0.0508) (0.1183) (0.0474)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) 0.0004 0.0008 0.0004 0.0002 0.0005
N (positive) 773 667 440 81 513
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01

Community Shocks Predicting Individual Shocks

Outcome: Individual shock (LPM). Columns indicate type of shock
Non-religious shocks Negative shocks Death of relative
Shock in Community (Yes / No) 0.0905*** 0.0734*** 0.0756***
(0.0052) (0.0039) (0.0042)
Household FE Yes Yes Yes
Period FE Yes Yes Yes
N 14,666 14,666 14,666
R² (within) 0.0425 0.0452 0.0451
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01

Baseline Shock Reports

shock_type_label Livestock Death Natural Disaster Other Relative Death Religious Event
treatment
Control 141 41 8 137 283
Predictable 145 49 7 154 294
Stable 139 38 5 150 273
Unpredictable 387 100 18 405 780

Endline Shock Reports

shock_type_label Livestock Death Natural Disaster Other Relative Death Religious Event
treatment
Control 96 8 17 121 168
Predictable 92 15 31 125 159
Stable 75 21 27 142 171
Unpredictable 236 51 74 363 438
 
Cookie Preferences